Integrity
Methodology rigour, MRV quality, third-party verification status and the credibility of the issuing registry.
Our scoring system rates every credit on integrity, additionality, permanence and delivery risk — registry-agnostic, transparent, and built for procurement teams who need defensible decisions.
Methodology rigour, MRV quality, third-party verification status and the credibility of the issuing registry.
Evidence the project would not have happened without carbon finance — financial, regulatory and common-practice tests.
Reversal risk over the credit lifetime, buffer pool coverage and the durability of the underlying carbon storage.
Operational, jurisdictional and counterparty risk affecting whether the credit will actually be issued and transferred on time.
We pull project documents, registry records, MRV reports, satellite data and any independent ratings into a normalised profile.
Each of the four pillars is scored 0–100 by rubric, with weighted sub-criteria specific to the project type (forestry, cookstoves, ARR, DAC, etc.).
We combine the pillars into a single 0–100 Terminal Carbon score and a letter band (AAA → C) shown on every project card.
Scores are re-evaluated when new MRV reports, registry events or material news appear — never frozen at listing time.
We are not a registry, not a developer, and not paid by issuers to assign a score. The framework is published, the inputs are auditable, and every project page shows the underlying evidence.